Could we be flying from New York to China in under three hours in the future? (Courtesy: commdiginews.com) |
For the
next 27 years, Great Britain
and France
offered flights that cruised at 1,354 mph and had a maximum speed of more than
twice the speed of sound. Flying at about 60,000 feet, Concorde soared at the
edge of space, connecting New York with London in slightly over 3
hours.
The name
"Concorde" was chosen because it meant "harmony" or
"union" thus reflecting the co-operation between the United Kingdom and France to make the project a
reality.
Service
stopped in the latter part of 2003 due to a low number of passengers, a slump
in air travel resulting from the 9/11/2001 attacks and rising maintenance
costs. There had also been a crash three years earlier, which had nothing to do
with a plane malfunction, but served as an impetus to cease operations.
Flying
Concorde was an expensive proposition with limited routes which, for the most
part, put ticket prices out of reach except for the wealthiest clientele or for
travelers who wished to fly it once in a lifetime as a novelty. Commercially
however, Concorde was not economically feasible for either British Airways or
Air France.
Another
factor that played a major role in the downfall was the lack of competition
which would have produced new technologies that might have evolved into more
efficient service and number of routes.
Capacity
of Concorde planes was approximately 100 or slightly more, which also meant
that fewer passengers were dividing the costs of bigger, slower more
commercially viable jets.
UK and French Concordes debuted in 1976 and flew for nearly three decades (Eduard Marmet, British Airways Concorde G-BOAC 03, CC BY-SA 3.0) |
Now,
just 15 years since the demise of Concorde, Boeing has unveiled plans for what
could become the world's first commercial hypersonic airliner. In case you are
wondering about the difference between supersonic and hypersonic, a hypersonic
plane will fly at five times the speed of sound, or about 3,800 mile per hour
while cruising at altitudes of 90,000 to 95,000 feet. At that height,
passengers will see the curvature of the earth below their windows and the
blackness of space above.
In
addition, because there is no atmospheric turbulence at those altitudes,
flights will be extremely smooth without the bumps that often infringe upon
jets flying between 30,000 and 40,000 feet.
One
expert claims that hypersonic speeds could go from New
York to Shanghai ,
China in a
little over two hours. If true, a businessman could literally commute between
the two destinations in a single day if a face to face meeting was warranted at
the last minute.
The
obvious question then becomes if supersonic aviation was economically
prohibitive before, then how could hypersonic service alter the parameters to
make it more palatable to the flying public in the future?
Part of
the reason for Boeing's optimism has arisen from the fact that it recently won
a military contract to build a hypersonic spaceplane. Apparently, company
officials have determined that if they are already in the process of developing
technologies for a military venture, then why not create ideas for a plane that
will accommodate commercial passengers while they are at it?
The
critical factor, of course, is figuring out how to make hypersonic air travel
convenient and affordable enough to overcome the high costs for the service.
Without multiple routes, relatively workable pricing and competition,
hypersonic flights could simply be nothing more than an aviation pipedream for
the masses.
Estimates
for when a hypersonic aircraft might be unveiled are all over the spectrum.
Some say they could be ready by 2022. Others think they are still a decade away
while more cautious opinions say the service is still 20 or 30 years in the
future.
Given
that Boeing is already working on the project, combined with the acceleration
of global technology, a decade seems to be the most accurate estimate, at least
for the introduction of the spaceplane.
Other
considerations that must be dealt with are passenger comforts such as being
pushed back in their seats on take-off. On typical flights today, such feelings
are minimal and only last a minute or so. However, on a hypersonic flight that
sensation may be more than ten minutes and the question is whether passengers
will accept the temporary discomfort.
Concordes
also expanded during flight, so aircraft design had to be focused upon reducing
or eliminating stress on the skin of the plane. At Mach-5 such factors need to
be worked out and overcome well in advance.
Noise
abatement is another problem. Not so much for people on the plane but for those on the
ground, expecially in the flight path.
Something
called the Quiet Supersonic Transport (QueSST) has been designed to produce
significantly lower sonic booms than in the past, meaning that in this case
"lowering the boom" is a good thing.
Presently,
Aviation Week says NASA hopes to see first flight testing as soon as 2021.
Who
knows, perhaps Jules Verne should have written about hypersonic planes that are
designed to look like gigantic hypodermic needles, and the sequel to his novel
could be titled Around the World in 80 Minutes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment